Question Bank / Reading and Writing / Command of Evidence
Command of Evidence SAT question
Reading and Writing · Information and Ideas · Medium · Answer it here, explanation included.
- For each data category, the following bars are shown:
- low information
- high information
- The data for the 7 categories are as follows:
- 1:
- low information: 78%
- high information: 92%
- 2:
- low information: 62%
- high information: 85%
- 3:
- low information: 57%
- high information: 86%
- 4:
- low information: 47%
- high information: 80%
- 5:
- low information: 62%
- high information: 87.5%
- 6:
- low information: 69%
- high information: 88%
- 7:
- low information: 81.5%
- high information: 94%
- 1:
Economists Kerwin Kofi Charles and Melvin Stephens Jr. investigated a variety of factors that influence voter turnout in the United States. Using survey data that revealed whether respondents voted in national elections and how knowledgeable respondents are about politics, Charles and Stephens claim that the likelihood of voting is driven in part by potential voters’ confidence in their assessments of candidates—essentially, the more informed voters are about politics, the more confident they are at evaluating whether candidates share their views, and thus the more likely they are to vote.
Which choice best describes data in the graph that support Charles and Stephens’s claim?
ExplanationShow
Choice A is the best answer because it uses data from the graph to effectively support Charles and Stephens’s claim about how level of information affects voters. The graph shows the probability of voting for both high- and low-information voters in seven categories of political orientation. Charles and Stephens claim that “the more informed voters are about politics…the more likely they are to vote.” This statement correctly asserts that the graph shows a higher probability of voting for high-information voters than for low-information voters at each of the seven political orientations. Thus, this statement accurately cites data from the graph that support Charles and Stephens’s claim about how level of information affects voters.
Choice B is incorrect. Although this statement is correct that the only probability in the graph below 50% is for low-information voters categorized as independent (orientation 4), the claim in question is about the relative likelihood that low- and high-information voters will vote, and without some reference to high-information voters, this statement cannot help support such a comparison. Choice C is incorrect. Although this statement is correct that the highest probabilities of voting for low-information voters are at the ends of the orientation scale (1 and 7), the claim in question is about the relative likelihood that low- and high-information voters will vote, and without some reference to high-information voters, this statement cannot help support such a comparison. Choice D is incorrect because the graph does not give any information about how many people are represented in any of the categories, so this statement is not based on data from the graph. Furthermore, even if we did have this information, the claim is about how level of information affects voters’ probability of voting, not whether they’re likely to strongly identify with a particular political party.
Drill this skill on Aceit
Adaptive practice, a daily plan, and score tracking take a free account so we can save your work.
More Command of Evidence questions
- 1,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000Number of municipalitiesno responseresponded to inquiryoffered incentiveMunicipalities’ Responses to Inquiries about Potential Incen
- Although many transposons, DNA sequences that move within an organism's genome through shuffling or duplication, have become corrupted and inactive over time, those from the long i
- Sample of Food Items from Gemini Mission Menus Food itemDayMealSugar cookie cubes1BChicken and vegetables2BShrimp cocktail4CHot cocoa3A To make sure they got the nutrition they ne
- 200150100500Uncertainty(larger values = more uncertainty) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Economic Policy Uncertainty in the United Kingdom, 2005–2010Year tax and public spendin
- 140,000120,000100,00080,00060,00040,00020,0000Area (square meters)198719932006Characteristics of the Banks of the Provo River Downstream of the Jordanelle DamYear grass cover bare
- 605550454035302520151050Female farmersas a percentage of totalnorth Ondocentral Ondosouth OndoPercentage of Ondo State Small-Scale Farmers Who Are Female, by Main Crop GrownOndo St